Distinguish among four market structures: perfect competition, monopolistic

competition, oligopoly, and monopoly in this order.

There are many different categories of “market structures” that describe an economy. They all have their own set of features and expectations. This assists in affecting the decisions and the profits that businesses are able to make. The four “market structures” that we are distinguishing among are “perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly.” These four “market structures” do not all occur in realism. A few of them are only hypothetical ideas but of crucial importance for the reason that they can demonstrate pertinent features of the decision making of rival businesses.

These four expectations tell us that we will barely ever see “perfect competition” in existence. This is a significant feature for the reason that it is the one market structure that is only hypothetically ideas.

  • Perfect Competition defines a “market structure” where a vast amount of small companies is vying against each other. The companies in this “market structure” do not have any substantial market control. The companies in this structure do not have the capacity to impact the market costs. The concept of “perfect competition” erects on some expectations:
    • all businesses make the most of revenues,
    • allowed to enter and leave the market,
    • all companies sell exactly the same things, and
    • there are no customer favorites. 

    These four expectations are somewhat more near to existence than what we saw in “perfect competition.” Nevertheless, this “market structure” will not have an outcome in a socially ideal amount of productivity, for the reason that the companies have further control and can impact market amounts to a specific step.

    • Monopolistic Competition as well as signifies a “market structure,” where a great number of small establishments rival against each other. The firms in “monopolistic competition” sell comparable, but somewhat distinguished goods as “perfect competition” does not. This allows them to have some market power and in turn permits them to be capable of charging higher amounts between a specific series. “Monopolistic competition” is created on a few expectations:
      • every business capitalizes on revenues,
      • allowed to enter and leave the market,
      • all companies sell different goods, and
      • customers may have a desire for just one item over another.

    Identify your company’s market structure (i.e., perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly), explaining your reasoning.

    • Oligopoly defines as a “market structure” which is conquered by just a minor amount of businesses. The outcome is in a situation of partial rivalry. The companies can vie against each other or cooperate. If they do this, they are able to use their shared market control to increase prices and receive more revenue. The “oligopoly market structure” is created on a few expectations:
      • all businesses make the most of revenues,
      • “oligopolies” are able to create amounts,
      • there are barricades to enter and leave the market,
      • goods may be similar or distinguished, and
    • there are just a couple of companies that control the market.
      • Monopoly is defined as a “market structure” where only one company has the power over the entire market and customers have no substitutes. As an outcome, “monopolies” 
      • frequently decrease production to rise amounts and make more revenue. “Monopoly” is created on the following expectations:
      • the monopoly makes the most of the revenue,
      • it is able to establish the amount,
    • there are extreme barricades to enter and leave the market, and
      • there is just a single business which rules the complete market.
      • The majority of “monopolies” are typically not wanted, for the reason that the outcome has lesser productivities and greater prices equated to viable markets. Thus, they are often ruled by the government.

    The “market structures” I believe that “Apple Inc.” can be considered are “oligopoly” and “monopolistic competition.” “Apple Inc.” supports “oligopoly market structure” in the rivalry of smart telephone brand advertisements, but “Apple Inc.” is acknowledged as “monopolistic competition” in the patented computers. “Monopolistic competition” is in which numerous vendors are creating very distinguished goods. “Monopolistic competition” defines the demand-side to be similar and noble to the “monopolistic competition” on the source side.

    A few economists tell us that “monopolistic competition” is further genuine than “perfect competition” for the reason that goods generated by the opponents are mixed. “Imperfect competition” does not function below harsh and rigorous methods of “perfect competition.” In this market situation of “imperfect competition,” the unit likes the ease of rising the amount just to produce extreme revenues. “Apple Inc.” sells the undistinguishable technology in the market. It allows them to last in the market efficiently and resourcefully.

    Relating to “oligopoly” and “monopolistic competition” has far more opponents, therefore Apple’s “super tablet” computer is regarded as a “monopolistic competition.” Countless other computer businesses (Dell, HP, etc.) are powerful opponents that are a portion of the portable and tablet computers market worldwide. The income produced by viable businesses is near sufficient to “Apple Inc.” that helps themselves to stay viable.

    The “monopolistic” viable market signifies the following characteristics:

    There are numerous creators and customers in this method. Therefore, there is a short attention ratio.

    Customers observe that there are non-price variances between the rivals’ goods. There is a huge non-price rivalry.

    There are a few barricades to enter and leave the market. Not like “monopoly,” there are no limitations to get into the viable setting. This is defined as the short-run revenue that will fetch other creators into the manufacturing part, and therefore standard proceeds are only completed in the long-run.

    “Apple Inc.” implements and transmits individual activity. There is a joint linkage idea in the rival’s businesses.

    All units’ purpose is to increase up their revenues for a certain amount of time. The purchaser attempts to capitalize on happiness by their buying from such establishments.

    Occasionally, “monopolistic competition” is not able to efficiently use their assigned bases. They develop into unproductive for the reason that they typically depend on a market regulator if any other opponent takes the greater position by pleasing manufactured goods overview. “Monopolistic competitive” units have a modest level of market power while “oligopolistic” businesses have a robust grade of market power.


    Amacher, R. and Pate, J. (2019). Principles of microeconomics (2nd ed.). Retrieved from

    Heneghan, C. (2014). Apple: Luxury Brand in the Making? Retrieved from

    Richards, L. (2019). 5 Different Types of Market Systems. Retrieved from

    Team Wall Street Survivor (2016). 4 MARKET STRUCTURES IN ECONOMICS. Retrieved from

    Thielman.S, (2016). Apple shares fall after reports of cuts to iPhone 6S and 6S Plus production. The Guardian. Retrieved from le-shares-fall-reports-cuts-iphone-6s-plus-production