Information Literacy Assignment On Previous Topic School Bully

Information Literacy Assignment

Name

Class

Date

Information Literacy Assignment

The peer review cycle is a very effective way to improve writing. Some of the most important points of the peer review cycle are the idea, research, conference, writing the paper, and peer review. Coming up with an idea is always the first step of writing, and without this step, none of the latter could be accomplished. Research also plays a huge role in the peer review process as the author conducts hours of research to familiarize himself and gain knowledge upon the chosen topic. Conferences are an amazing place where writers can present their research where, in return, they will receive good feedback and ideas to spark the beginning of their writing. Writing the actual manuscript is a very important point because this is where all of the hard hours of brainstorming, researching, and conferencing finally come together. Once the author has finished writing their paper, it is sent to an editor and to peer reviewers. The peer reviewers play the biggest role in ensuring that the paper is credible, determining whether the methodology is sound, and verifying that it is a contribution to the field. After reading and reviewing, the peer reviewers then either recommend for the paper to be publish, suggest for the paper to be rewritten and revised, or they may reject the paper. All in all, those five points play the greatest role in the peer review process.

One of the most common mistakes is to think that both the editor and peer reviewers do the same job, in fact, they do not. The editor is the one that is responsible for reviewing the paper for content, creativity, clarity, and whether or not the article contributes to the knowledge of the field. Once done reviewing, it is up to the editor if he will send the article to get peer reviewed. The editor is the one who ultimately decides what will and will not be published after peer review, and he works with the author to improve the article until its completion. On the other hand, the peer reviewers are responsible for reviewing the paper for verification, credibility, and correct methodology. Unlike the editor, the peer reviewers do not know who the author of the paper is, which is why peer reviewing is often referred to as a “blind” review. Once done reviewing, they may either recommend that the paper becomes published, suggest revising, or they will reject the article. The editor is the one that decides whether or not the article will be sent for publication.

While I was researching, I made sure to refine my search so that only peer reviewed articles were included. This is how I ensured that only credible articles were part of my search. It is usually simple to determine this information in a library database search because it shows whether or not the article has been peer reviewed. In a general internet search, it is uncommon to check whether or not an article has been peer reviewed. This is why library database searches can yield the best research because most, if not all, have been peer reviewed.