Website Review and Summary

Website Review and Summary


Website Review and Summary

The primary health subject common in Mecklenburg communities is a sexually transmitted disease. According to the Mecklenburg County (2010) Community Health Assessment “Mecklenburg area was one of six counties reporting the highest charge per unit of syphilis increase in North Carolina. Between 2008-2009 the primary and secondary example rate in the county increased by 138%, from 5353 cases per 100,000 to a rate of 3.1.”

The CDC, website indicates that syphilis is a disease that if not treated can become a grave matter. Not only for you but your partner as well, for the fact that it is a sexual contamination infection. The CDC website also indicates that syphilis has four stages which are primary, secondary, latent, and Tertiary. For example, when an individual has syphilis, for the most part, he or she will have a sore or wounds at the first site of contamination. These sores happen nearby the private parts, around the rear-end or in the rectum or in or around the mouth. These sores are for the most part, however, but not generally firm, round, and painless.

The side effect of secondary syphilis incorporates skin rashes, swollen lymph nodes, and fever. The signs and side effects of primary and secondary syphilis can be mild, and they might not get noticed. During the latent stage, there are no signs or side effects. Tertiary syphilis is related with serious medicinal checkup issues. A specialist can generally determine tertiary syphilis to have the assistance of numerous tests. It can influence the heart, mindset, and different organs of the body,” (Syphilis (2017) CDC Fact Sheet). Another reality is that as per the CDC, site, a man can get syphilis by coordinate contact with a syphilis sore during vaginal, anal, or oral sex. Syphilis can also transition from a contamination female to her unborn baby,” (Syphilis (2017) CDC Fact Sheet).

“The structure for National agencies is, Governmental, Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Institute of Health, Food and Drug Administration, Health Resources and Services Administration, Agency for Health Research and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, and Indian Health Services,” according to the (Weekly Overview week one (2017).

The structure for State agencies is, Public health departments or departments of health, State chapters of nongovernmental health agencies, such as the American Heart Association, and State public health associations Whereas, the structure for Local agencies are, City: county public health departments, Community health centers, and Local chapters: nongovernmental agencies and professional organizations, according to (Weekly Overview week one (2017).

The weekly overview for week one indicates that the function is: assess, diagnose and investigate health problems. Policy development: Inform, educate, and empower people about health issues. Mobilize community partnerships to identify and solve health problems. Develop policies and plans that support health efforts. Assurance: enforce laws and regulations to protect the health and ensure safety. Link people to health services. Ensure the provision of competent public and personal health workers. Evaluate the effectiveness, accessibility, and quality of personnel and population health-based services, and Institute of Medicine (IOM): research new insights and innovative solutions for health problems, according to (Weekly Overview week one (2017).

A useful public health framework that can assure the country’s well-being requires the collaborative efforts of an intricate system of individuals and associations in people in public and private sectors, as well as an alignment of policy and practice with regards to governmental public health organizations at the national, state, and local levels. In the United States, governments at all levels federal, state, and local all have a particular duty to strive to make the conditions in which individuals can be as healthy as possible. For governments to assume their role inside the public health framework, policymakers must give the political and budgetary help required for reliable and successful governmental public health agencies, as indicated by (The Future of the Public Health in the 21st Century (2003), Charpter.3, pg.96).

Numerous boards of trustees trust that the federal and state, and governments share a duty for assuring the public health. From a constitutional and historical point of view, public health is to a great extent a state and local function. The role of the states and localities is an essential and vital one. The federal government has the assets, ability, and the commitment to evaluate the health of the country and to make proposals for its change. ensuring a sound public health foundation is a pressing issue, and the trustees ask the government to participate in making plans for national and regional funding to achieve this, as indicated by (The Future of the Public wellbeing in the 21st Century (2003), Chapter.3, pg.96)

All levels of government work together for many reasons. However, the main reason is so they all can have some collaboration, coordination, and mobilization of efforts, according to (Weekly Overview week one (2017). That is because, national agencies work together for national health needs, and creates regulation. Nongovernmental agencies work together with schools, advocacy, and health services. The State and Local agencies work together for public health, safety. The State sets rules and regulations, and make sure the immunization requirement for school entry is carried out. The State also provides services such as personal health, environmental health, health resources, and laboratories. Whereas, the Local agencies services are for immunizations, sexually transmitted disease prevention, treatment and control, inspections, and testing.

In 1932, Franklin Delano Roosevelt said, “The well-being of its citizens must measure the success or failure of any government in the final analysis. Nothing can be more important to a state than its public health.” (quoted in Community-Based Research (2013). However, up to this point, medicinal research essentially watched out for the necessities of the majority population, with little examination of the social or sexual introduction develop impacts considering sickness rates or health results among diverse groups. However, according to Community-Based Research (2013) as of today, the U.S. populace keeps on growing in diversity, health variations have transpired between different populace groups. Medicinal services analysts logically see of the impact of race, culture, original introduction, budgetary status, living conditions, and geography on the strength of individuals and communities.


Community-Based Research (2013) Retrieved from,

Mecklenburg County(2010) Community Health Assessment, Retrieved from,

Syphilis (2017) CDC Fact Sheet, Retrieved from,

The National Academy of Sciences (2017) The Future of the Public health in the 21st Century (2003) The Governmental Public Health Infrastructure, (Charpter.3, pg. 96) Retrieved from,

Weekly Overview Week One (2017). Retrieved from. The University of Phoenix, HCS/457 Course, Version 4,