PHI208 Week 1 Assignment: Physician-Assisted Suicide

Physician-Assisted Suicide

PHI208: Ethics and Moral Reasoning

Physician-Assisted Suicide

Part 1: Ethical Question

Does a person with a terminal condition have a right to physician-assisted suicide? (Anderson, 2018) 

Part 2: Introduction

Dying is a tough subject for anybody to cope. The majority of folks do not choose to reflect it at the beginning. There are at all times two sides to a story, and we as people tend to jump to assumptions on whether it is ethically or morally true or false. Regarding terminating a life, many aspects considered. There are a few individuals that interpret this plan as being ethically wrong. Countless individuals exist day to day in much agony that they cannot stand it and they as well have been provided with a length of time on just how long they have before they die. There are two critical questions in thinking about this topic. The two issues are as follows:

Do incurably ill individuals possess the right to choose once they are prepared to die and go to a significantly better place, so they no longer have to suffer?

Is slaying somebody by the method of assisted suicide be similar to allowing them to pass away by means of being allowed to die?

When thinking about which side, you are on you need to look at each side of the morals and ethics when selecting to die or not to die.

Part 3: Position Statement

When individuals that are terminal have approached the end and have given up should be given the right to terminate their pain and misery. Physician-assisted suicide is morally acceptable for individuals who identified as being incurable, and no additional assistance can be provided. Physician-assisted suicide ought to be a legal process, so folks can have the rights to choose to live in constant pain or die peacefully. Everybody in our world nowadays has the moral right to decide whatever they need to do with their life but do not hurt others during the procedure. By having this moral right, the individual decides on the option to terminate their life at what time they wish to do so. When these terminally ill individuals ask for assistance in ending their life, their family and doctors must honor their desires and do everything to make them comfy as imaginable.

Part 4: Reasons in Support of Your Position

An illness that makes the lungs harden and is not curable will soon begin to take over that individual and producing considerable quantities of pain and will gradually kill the person. In a case like this, they ought to be permitted to choose to finish their life with self-respect. An individual, who is continuously in misery, in tremendous quantities of pain and not have much time left here on earth must not be made to feel the burden that has placed upon their family.

Part 5: Opposing Position Statement

Even if the person that is in misery has faith in that it will help them to be aided with a physician-assisted suicide, folks who are against, think

it is not anyone’s position to help in putting an end to someone’s life.

Part 6: Reasons in Support of the Opposing Position

If there is no physician-assisted suicide, individuals that are terminally ill would not possess a purpose or whatever is measured an accurate way to give up on their life, and consequently, they may well go on battling to survive. Our culture does not need to ponder that physician-assisted suicide is the only way out to everybody’s issues.

References

Anderson, J. (2018). Written Assignment Ethical Topics and Questions List. Retrieved from

https://ashford.instructure.com/courses/24412/discussion_topics/693695

Battin,M., van deer Heide, A., Ganzini, L., van der Wal, G., & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. (n.d.).

Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups. Volume 33, Issue 10. Retrieved from

Griffith, R. (2017). Courts to look again at assisted dying law. British Journal of Community

Nursing 22(5): 252-254. (3p). Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.proxy-librar y.ashford.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=4&sid=ef33e5d8-f8db-4570-8627-59926d27031c%4 0sessionmgr4008&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=28467248&db=cmedm

Inbadas, H., Zaman, S., Whitelaw, S., & Clark, D. (2017). Declarations on euthanasia and assisted dying. Death Studies, Vol 41(9), pp. 574-584, 11p. Retrieved from http://eds.a.e bscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/results?vid=1&sid=ef33e5d8-f8db-4570-8627-59926d27031c%40sessionmgr4008&bquery=Declarations+%22on%22+euthanas ia&bdata=JnR5cGU9MCZzaXRlPWVkcy1saXZlJnNjb3BlPXNpdGU%3d

Magelssen, M., Supphellen, M., Nortvedt, P., & Materstvedt, M. (2016). Attitudes towards assisted dying are influenced by question wording and order: A survey experiment. BMC Medical Ethics, Vol 1. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.prox

y-library.ashford.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=5&sid=d04b72f3a-bada-46e2-877-54744d03

WRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2016-21561-001&db=psyh

Thames, B. (2018). How should one live? An introduction to ethics and moral reasoning (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu

Varelius, J.(2016). Physician-assisted dying and two senses of an incurable condition. Journal of Medical Ethics: Journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics, Vol 42(9), Sep, 2016. pp. 601-604. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/detail/deta

il?vid=8&sid=-bad04b72f3da-46e2-87a7-54744d038a13%40sessionmgr4008&bdata=Jn

NpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2016-49470-013&db=ps

yh