Traffic network plan
Background of the city
According to 2014 statistics Las Vegas has an estimated population 613,599 people. The city receives approximately 40 million tourist a year
The LVCVA distributes insights for Las Vegas, Laughlin and Mesquite that incorporate guest volume, tradition participation, inhabitance levels, room stock, gaming incomes, carrier travelers and car movement.
Requesters of this information get the official synopsis, which incorporates both current month and year-to-date information for the present and earlier year.
Background of the city
The movement of people in and out of the system creates the need for a well defined transport network. That is effective and reduce the possibility of traffic snarl ups.
The city has almost all vehicles.
Tourist either use rentals or come with their own.
There is shuttle services in the city.
The large number of people in the city is an issues in making the network plan.
The city is mostly flat with a few valley and hill, Herczog, (2008).
the plans take in consideration on this, hill and valleys should have more lanes due to the fact that vehicles will be moving slowly.
In Las Vegas the traffic is evenly distributed through the day the day, with sometimes an increase midday and at night. (Herczog, 2008).
All this information gives a clear picture of how the city is, hence knowing what is required for the network. Thus bringing us to this plan.
Rising traffic congestion is an inevitable condition in huge and developing metropolitan regions over the world.
Top hour activity clog is an inalienable consequence of the way present day social society operates work.
It originates from the boundless yearnings of individuals to seek after specific objectives that unavoidably over-burden existing streets and road frameworks consistently. everybody hates traffic congestion, and it continues deteriorating, regardless of endeavored cures. ( falcocchio & Levinson, 2015)
Workers are regularly disappointed by policymakers’ failure to take care of the issue, which represents a huge open approach challenge.
Despite the fact that legislatures might never have the capacity to wipe out road congestion, there are a few ways urban communities and states can move to control it.
Traffic in Las Vegas is a common scenario thanks to the increasing number of personal and commercial vehicles in the streets. As a traffic planner, I will employ the following mechanism to help reduce and minimize traffic congestion in Las Vegas.
Use of electric underground trains to minimizing traffic in Las Vegas
Use of underground trains will help reduce traffic in the city since people will be using train transport reducing the number of vehicles
Its fast, safe and classy thus will be preferred to vehicles by commuters hence reduce traffic since most people will be using it.
Its environmental friendly since it has minimal emissions therefore should be adopted as major form of transportation in the city
Redesigning Types of roads
Major cause of traffic congestion in Las Vegas is the design of the road network.
Roads should be designed such that, there is ease in interconnection which enables vehicles to move freely and easily from different lanes to avoid slowing down and building traffic jam ( Serligher, 2012).
Reconstruction of round about to enable T-turns and to hinder head-on collisions
Traffic signal such as traffic lights, round about counting clock will manage movement of vehicles in a systematic manner in the process reducing traffic jam.
Commuter shuttles will reduce the number of personal vehicles in the city since most people will be using public transport means. ( Nevada et all, 1979).
They are large and will transport many people at the same time.
Introduction of commuter shuttles to ferry passengers
Road signs enables motorists to be responsible and give directions
Guides motorist on the speed they should drive at, will prevents traffic jam from building.
Falcocchio, J. C., & Levinson, H. S. (2015). Road traffic congestion: A concise guide.
Herczog, M. (2008). Las Vegas 2008. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Pub. S
Klügl, F., Bazzan, A., & Ossowski, S. (2005). Applications of Agent Technology in Traffic and Transportation. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.
Sehlinger, B. (2012). The unofficial guide to Las Vegas 2012. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.
Nevada., Montgomery Engineers of Nevada., & Pinnell-Anderson-Wilshire and Associates. (1979). Las Vegas urban area traffic control system study: Executive summary. Las Vegas, Nev.: State of Nevada, Dept. of Highways.
Click following link to download this document
Traffic network plan Traffic Network Analysis .pptx