BA 325 week 2 assignment National Right to Work States

National Right to Work States

Name

School

Instructor

Date due

National Right to Work States

The National Right to Work States has been adopted by almost 27 states whereby the employee has right to exercise what they deserve being governed by this law. Historically, the National Right to Work has been assisting all the employees in workplaces to fully exercise their rights. The unions have been facing serious challenge whereby many employees are unwilling to join these unions. The private sectors and nongovernmental organization are dominating and having the biggest percentage of workers (Ralston et al. 2007). These private sectors are providing the best services to the employees and also the employers are willing to listen to employee concerns. The employees therefore are not forced to join the unions. They join willingly but not being forced by the National Right law. In my state, the Right to Work has been exercised by the employees whereby they are fully governed by the National law. The National Right to Work prohibits the labor unions from demonstrating or delivering their grievances to the employers.

National Right to Work has really helped the employees whereby the law has tried to eliminate the dues paid by the workers in order to be employed. The law provides the employees with various options in order to make the right decisions. For instance, the National Right to Work allows the employees to make the right decisions either to join the unions or not to join. The employees are not forced to join the unions but to make their own decisions. The Right to Work law does not support the unionization hence contributing to the fall of the unions. Many states have adopted the Right to Work law overtaking the labor unions. Many employees object the unionization due to the Right to Work law which assists them in employment sectors. Many republicans thought that it was the Obama’s thought that the Right to Work law was effective to them but it was their surprise that the Donald Trump also supported the law. The principle of the National Right to Work law affirms that the employees should work freely in their job opportunities without being compelled to the labor unions (Ralston et al. 2007).

Additionally,United States is one of the states that the National Right to Work law has been a success. The law in United States has been adopted to protect the workers from being compelled to unions or from paying dues for employment. The employees in United States are secured from any union whereby the employees make their own decisions whether to join the work unions or not to join. The law does not provide any limitations for the dues payments. These dues are paid by the employees who are thereafter locked by the created labor unions. This made the National Right to Work to come in and protect the pressure the employees are subjected to by the unions. United States employees have Right to work whereby they decide for themselves either to join or to reject. Even when some of the employees have joined the unions, they have protection which does not give the limitations on the due date of paying for the taxes. It is therefore the responsibility of the unions to negotiate with the employers to allow the employees join the unions. The unions also request the employers to allow the employees volunteer themselves for their dues to be deducted from their salaries if they have joined the unions (Lumsden& Petersen, 2005).

According to Bush (2010) National Right to Work has been exercised since the year 1960. It was not seen as important until 2000 where many states are registering and implementing the law in the states. The law has really protected the employees from joining the unions until the unions are collapsing. The unions have found another way of convincing the employers to join the unions through the negotiation with the employers. After the employer has therefore agreed to deduct the employee’s dues, the unions are now capable of attracting other members from the same organization.Even when they unions are capable of convincing the employees, the National law educates the employees and warns them to be aware of what they sign. The foundation of the National Right to work attorneys provides free legal aid to all those employers who are out for the protection of the Right to work new regulations. The law advises the employees not to sign for the check off cards due to the promises they are provide with by the unions because at some point they will be stuck which would require them to pay for the dues for more than a year (Darling-Hammond, & Sykes, 2003).

In conclusion, the National Right to work law is neither an anti-union nor pro-union but it is out for the personal employee freedom. The workers freedom is important to all the organization as they are the key components of the organizational success. The employees need protection and right to make their own decisions with being forced to. There are also some rights of those employees who are non-Right to Work states but they have been identified by the United Statesruling. The employees are not forced to pay for the dues unless the dues have been established and stated (Bush, 2010).

References

Bush, G. W. (2010). The national security strategy of the United States of America. Executive Office of the President Washington Dc.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (2003). Wanted, a national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the” highly qualified teacher” challenge. education policy analysis archives, 11, 33.

Lumsden, K., & Petersen, C. (2005). The effect of right-to-work laws on unionization in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 83(6), 1237-1248.

Ralston, D. A., Holt, D. H., Terpstra, R. H., & Kai-Cheng, Y. (2007). The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: A study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China. Journal of international business studies, 177-207.