IT Support for Virtual Teams

IT Support for Virtual Teams

CIS 336: Enterprise Architecture

IT Support for Virtual Teams

Virtual teams are likewise commonly referred to as remote units. They represent a bunch of individuals who do their work across organizational/authoritative boundaries and space. With the goal that outcomes are accomplished continuously in light of the accessibility of communications technology (Parke, Campbell and Bartol, 2014).

There are five issues that the IT offices must manage when dealing with virtual teams and those inquiries include: The utilization of technology to bolster virtual teams that the IT division will need to settle to make the decision. Two, the techniques to use to give more connections and envelop the diversity that is available in the association. Unbalanced distribution of the data since virtual teams should supplant face-to-face and personal correspondence. It gets challenging to try to set up the amount of data that are transmitted prior to building the virtual team. The issue will be exchanged to the virtual team if, not addressed (Pinjani and Palvia, 2013).

Three, contrasts in timing and speed, this turns into an issue since a few individuals inside of the virtual teams, would have confined access to data than other, because of contrasts in time zones. Four, ambiguity about the importance of silence it gets to be trying to append a specific meaning to silence. For example, silence would imply that the beneficiary of the message is not around to answer to the message. On the contrast, it would imply that there is a technical breakdown that ought to be fixed. Five, unique implications of information salient, not at all like face-to-face discussions. Where the significance of a given message would be known by analyzing the outward appearance (facial expression) or the tone of the sender. It gets challenging when trying to set up the significance of a specific message when utilizing virtual teams (Zakaria and Al Safi, 2013). An architectural diagram that shows how virtual groups team up and share database archives demonstrated as follows:

The essential benefits of utilizing virtual teams incorporate: Cost saving virtual teams connected with cost cutting; this is on account of associations don’t acquire enormous expenses in real estate, selection, recruitment and letting office space among different costs. Two, virtual teams’ assistance in utilizing worldwide talent virtual teams grants associations search for aptitudes/skills past one geographical location. Three, result in expanded productivity benefits individuals from virtual teams have more focus on their occupations. Individuals don’t need to deal with organizational administrations and bureaucracies that obstruct their profitability and decision-making (Pinjani and Palvia, 2013).

Four, diminishes the time took to venture into new markets on account of the changing worldwide time zones; it is feasible for individuals from various time zones to deal with a specific venture full-time. Time zone abbreviates the time it takes to venture into new markets and diminishes the item life-cycle. Five, new opportunities; virtual teams give chances to individuals who are less portable and reluctant to move, either in light of their physical difficulties or family pressures (Pinjani and Palvia, 2013).

The primary demerits of virtual teams include: One, high cost of innovation; the effectiveness of virtual teams depend on having numerous and proficient advancements in technology. Such innovation incorporates instant messaging and video-conferencing; this innovation has a tendency to be costly. Two, absence of joint effort and trust the diversity of culture among organizational team that would bring about the resistance and confidence. Individuals from various races translate the same phenomena in various ways (Parke, Campbell and Bartol, 2014). Three, virtual teams promote social separation; individuals from virtual teams don’t have physical connection with one another meaning social confinement. Four, fulfilling the requirements of individuals from a virtual team is chaotic than addressing the necessities of individuals utilizing face-to-face and personal correspondence. Five, generation gap, more established, older representatives might not have the essential knowledge and mastery in utilizing new technology (Pinjani and Palvia, 2013).

The challenge postured by having IT standard that identifies with guaranteeing the privilege to confidentiality and privacy of individuals who protect. Can be taken care of by guaranteeing that no individual from a virtual team access private data through utilizing login passwords, the test of conventions can be controlled by connecting with the server directly or utilizing an authorized web supplier. To sum it all, the test of conventions/protocols can be taken care of by adopting an organizational structure with faint hierarchical structures and line of authority. The outcomes could guarantee that the results conveyed are speedier, and creativity enhanced (Parke, Campbell and Bartol, 2014).

Virtual teams are unique in relation to customary traditional units in a few perspectives. For example, since virtual teams don’t support open correspondence among association members since access to data is constrained, by contrast, traditional units are underlined on consensus building when settling on a decision. Conversely, traditional groups don’t depend intensely on the utilization of technology. Despite what might be expected, technology is the foundation of virtual teams. In conclusion, traditional units have the diverse qualities of culture, religion, race, and ethnicity. In any case, the technological advancements have made it feasible for virtual teams to join these distinctions since the worlds’ decreased into one global village (Gilson, Maynard, Young, Vartiainen and Hakonen, 2014).


Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Young, N. C. J., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2014).

Virtual Teams Research 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities. Journal of Management, 0149206314559946.

Parke, M. R., Campbell, E. M., & Bartol, K. M. (2014, January). Setting the Stage for Virtual Team Development: Designing Teams to Foster Knowledge Sharing. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 17244). The Academy of Management.

Pinjani, P., & Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information & Management50(4), 144-153.

Zakaria, N., & Al Safi, G. (2013). Promoting global virtual teams across the globe: cross-cultural challenges and synergies (pp. 164-173). IGI Global: Hershey, Pennsylvania (USA).

Place an Order

Plagiarism Free!

Scroll to Top