PHI 103 week 5 final paper: Science and Religion

Science and Religion

(name)

PHI 103: Informal Logic

(date)

Instructor:

Science and Religion

For as long as anyone can remember in record there has been much information for activities that seem out of individual control. In latest civil record, scientific & medical opinions have often contradicted each another. Religious ideas are mainly provided first & then enough medical proof builds up to challenge faith. These conclusions of technology are met with uncertainty and most of them are considered a heresy. Religion and science are available in a kind of pull and push relationship: in a same way like yen doesn’t exists without yes . Research aims to substitute faith with proven medical concepts & religion difficulties the scientific concepts with the durability and results of a faith.

Since the dark age groups until the 1700s, spiritual viewpoint was the 200 years, many associates of universities (a school of philosophy), using technological innovation to back them up, came up with fresh ways of interacting with some unanswerable concerns. People have striven to describe the various secrets of the galaxy, and to rationalize our everyday living in it. Throughout this voyage of self-understanding, many standpoints on existence of people have progressed and joined into a complicated, subjective symptom known as Religion. However, as mankind has expanded and innovated itself, many thoughts indicated by religion looks like hardly possible. Developments in technological innovation have produced a new type of individual thought that has disrupted and shaken the footings of spiritual viewpoint. Our new, technically based knowing of galaxy has unfolded a array of solutions to age-old concerns, which seems antithetical to the information provided by religion. As powerful medical proof has appeared which is in contrast to the existing spiritual view, open-minded followers have tailored their values accordingly, but numbers of fundamentalists are still protesting these scientific proofs. This is the main point of concern between religion and science. Many philosophers & theists have provided their opinions concerning the continuous fight between religion &science. When the chapel had the biggest power, scientific people were considered as the “wicked people.” In most cases it was far better to have faith in the chapel and their thoughts, in order not to be excommunicated or shunned by community. As a result, many situations happen between people believing in science and religion.

Getting back together between religion and science is difficult, because the statements made by region and the proof provided by scientific technology are so amazingly different. The progress of technology has triggered many theists to bargain conventional faith in order to assist in scientific progress , thus showing that scientific information of the galaxy are more possible than the points provided by religion. An outstanding example of this is the old concern of age of the earth. As per religious beliefs, the age of the earth is less than 10 million years. Whereas, there is a frustrating amount of technological proof that shows the earth age is in billions of years. Many spiritual thinkers have addressed this proof, by declaring that the techniques used to assess the age of earth are incorrect.

What commonalities exist between religion and science? One big way of placing this is that religion and science both agreed to that there are few elements that can’t be described. Concept locations elements in a causal perspective are greater than that provided by wise practice. Scientific and spiritual information enhance wise practice information. Individuals do not involve themselves in secret. Typical feeling is easier (e.g. healing a throbbing headache with pain killers in contrast to healing it with psychotherapy). Another likeness would be in “evolving a theoretical scheme, the human mind seems constrained to draw inspiration from analogy between the puzzling observations to be explained and certain already familiar phenomenon” (Pagett, Alan, Nov. 2007).These are few commonalities between religion and science.

What are the points of variations between religion and science? There have been many issues between science and religion in past records. Some previous commanders were used to jailed technical experts. Now the things have changed a lot. Individuals ask for proofs and results, but spiritualization; your personality developing is not the factor offered by technology. So, religion and science are different in the feeling of faith and facts. Both of them are essential in our life, As you can’t write on surfaces without thoughts and pens. Thoughts are provided by the religion and pens are provided by the science. Religion KNOWS “how elements came to be this way” and looks around at “what is” for assistance for that concept. Research looks around at “what is” and comes up with an IDEA of “how elements came to be this way.” Research is the analyzing characteristics according to proof and published logically. A religion promotion with matter of trust shows off by a deity. Some of the Holy bible is regarded to be traditionally appropriate while other areas that are allegorical or outstanding.

When spiritual statements are analyzed through scientific techniques, they are discovered to be incorrect and when statements given by scientific research are analyzed using the techniques of religion, they are also discovered to be incorrect. “Both experts and conventional philosopher generally use an insufficient simple fact requirements. Invoking viewpoint doesn’t assist because the problem of simple fact requirements is not often handled in viewpoint and in the circumstances when it has been resolved it continues to be uncertain. In technology no sufficient simple fact requirements has yet been determined. Reliability with statement is the conventional scientific test of simple fact or truth. But statement is always imperfect and research outcomes are therefore fundamentally preliminary even when they are carefully deduced from some other technical outcomes. A sufficient truth requirement was used by early Christians and is plainly described in the Holy bible as the stone upon which Christianity was established. But this groundwork needs very subjective perception in God. Moreover, this Spiritual fact requirement is nearly consistently denied in present conventional Religious perception and practice. As a result, as a matter of method, neither experts nor conventional religious philosopher use a efficient base for knowing simple fact and have often never accept it. No wonder antagonism between experts and spiritual followers and among the latter by themselves is long-lived, deep and harmful. Despite strongly- presented perception on important issues only few know what they are discussing and the obstacle is usually mutually frustrating” (King Wayne Holy bible, Matthew 18:15-18). What is the truth? Research is ever modifying and belief is overall constant, and final!

“religion is a sightless belief and Scientific study is brilliant knowing” When issue happens with overlap, sometimes conflicts occur, but it is never excellent. “Reality happens in the looking at many experts and, to higher or smaller level, of many christian and others, another direction available for the getting, either instead of or together with technology, is not restricting. While you adhere to this other direction, filter but immediately, you stay away from in the procedure (with important help from a Grateful Friend). The direction of least level of resistance was never and is not now the way to simple fact. Otherwise, where is the obstacle and analyze that lifestyle is designed to present?” (S. Weinberg 2001).

Proof for the everyday living of science concepts and spiritual tenets can’t always be acquired, the two are available independently and together in stability. They do, however, overlap within their enlightening stability and thus the issue of the two. “That experts and theologians are available in individual “camps” is a relatively latest department. Activity of thoughts between theological and experts believed has been more usually the case” (Levinson, P. 428, 2006). When the go of the Individual Genome Venture calls the inherited value “the terminology of God,” he warrants to be taken very seriously (Collins, 2006). Outside their particular variations religion and science have discovered to exist together, both acknowledging that without the religion viewpoint man would not have a significant compass with which to implement his scientific findings.

References

Collins, Francis S., The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief, Free Pr: S. & S., July 2006. c304p. Retrieved from EBSCO Host, March, 2012

Weinberg, Steven. Facing Up. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA, 46- 47 (2001).

Levinson, Martin. Science Versus Religion: A False Dichotomy? ETC: A Review of General Semantics; October 2006. Vol. 63 Issue 4, p422-429, 8p. Retrieved from EBSCO Host, March, 2012.

Padgett, Alan. Science and Religion, Philosophical Issues. November 2007. Retrieved March, 2012 from http://www.blackwell-compass.com

Dahneke, B. Define Universe and Give Two Examples. (2001) Retrieved March 2012 from http://defineuniverse.com/